Explore our knowledge

Louise Jør­ring

Postdoc

Subjects
Decision-making Public management Automatisation Digitalisation Qualitative methods Public sector

Primary research areas

Front­line work and pub­lic en­coun­ters
This re­search area ex­plores how front­line work­ers—such as so­cial work­ers, teach­ers, and po­lice of­ficers—in­ter­act with cit­izens in the de­liv­ery of pub­lic ser­vices. It fo­cuses on themes such as pro­fes­sion­al dis­cre­tion, de­cision-mak­ing, or­gan­iz­a­tion­al routines, doc­u­ment­a­tion prac­tices, and the power dy­nam­ics em­bed­ded in every­day en­coun­ters. The re­search spans fields such as pub­lic ad­min­is­tra­tion and so­ci­ology to un­der­stand how policies are in­ter­preted and en­acted in prac­tice.
Di­git­al­iz­a­tion of work
This re­search area in­vest­ig­ates how di­git­al tech­no­lo­gies—such as de­cision-sup­port sys­tems, self-ser­vice plat­forms, and AI—trans­form con­tem­por­ary work prac­tices. With a par­tic­u­lar fo­cus on front­line work in the pub­lic sec­tor, it ex­am­ines how di­git­al­iz­a­tion re­shapes pro­fes­sion­al dis­cre­tion, cit­izen en­coun­ters, and the or­gan­iz­a­tion­al routines that struc­ture ser­vice de­liv­ery. Draw­ing on vari­ous so­cial sci­ence dis­cip­lines, the re­search seeks to un­der­stand how di­git­al in­fra­struc­tures both en­able and con­strain pro­fes­sion­al judg­ment, and how em­ploy­ees ad­apt to, res­ist, or re­shape tech­no­lo­gies.
Qual­it­at­ive meth­ods
This re­search area fo­cuses on qual­it­at­ive meth­ods for study­ing work, or­gan­iz­a­tions, and pub­lic ser­vice de­liv­ery. It in­cludes eth­no­graph­ic field­work, in­ter­views and doc­u­ment ana­lys­is, with an em­phas­is on cap­tur­ing mean­ing-mak­ing, prac­tices, and power dy­nam­ics in con­text. The re­search is par­tic­u­larly in­ter­ested in how qual­it­at­ive meth­ods can be used to ex­plore the ex­per­i­ences and every­day prac­tices of front­line work­ers and cit­izens, as well as to trace or­gan­iz­a­tion­al pro­cesses and so­ci­o­tech­nic­al change over time.

Study­ing front­line prac­tices in pub­lic ser­vices

My research sheds light on how public sector organizations are changing — especially in the spaces where citizens meet the state. I study how frontline workers navigate competing demands, digital technologies, and shifting values in their everyday work, with a focus on meaning-making and professional judgment. 

Through the projects Valuing Invisible Work and RECORD, I explore how digitalization and recordkeeping shape roles, relationships, and decision-making in frontline settings. My work shows how public sector reforms and digital tools affect not just efficiency, but also the human side of service provision. 

I use qualitative methods — including interviews, observations, document analysis and time studies — to understand how change unfolds in practice. I also teach organizational theory and qualitative methods, with a focus on helping students engage critically with real-world organizational dynamics — something I truly enjoy. My research supports more thoughtful policy design and greater recognition of frontline workers’ care, knowledge, and discretion. 

Publications

See all publications

September 2025

Automatically Prepared?

How Frontline Workers Cope in the Face of Automation

Lou­i­se Jør­ring, Postdoc

Go to publication

September 2025

Tensions in Time-saving Technologies

Adjusting Work Rhythms in the Digitalized Public Sector Frontline

Lou­i­se Jør­ring, Postdoc

Lise Ju­ste­sen, Associate Professor

Ur­su­la Ples­ner, Associate Professor

Go to publication

28 June 2025

Digitalisation and Meaningful Frontline Work

Insights From the Danish Public Employment Services

Lou­i­se Jør­ring, Postdoc

Go to publication

Recent research projects

Re­cord­keep­ing in Front­line Work: Bal­an­cing Bur­eau­crat­ic, Pro­fes­sion­al and Re­la­tion­al Con­cerns (RE­CORD)

The pro­ject is fun­ded by the In­de­pend­ent Re­search Fund Den­mark and runs from 2024 to 2027. It ex­am­ines the cru­cial role of writ­ten case re­cords in pub­lic ser­vice de­liv­ery. Bey­ond serving leg­al and ad­min­is­trat­ive func­tions, case re­cords are key tools for know­ledge shar­ing, co­ordin­a­tion, and in­creas­ingly, for re­la­tion­al work in cit­izen en­coun­ters. Des­pite their mul­tiple pur­poses and grow­ing com­plex­ity, we know little about how and why case re­cords are pro­duced and used in prac­tice — and what this means for cit­izens and their ex­per­i­ence of pub­lic ser­vices. The pro­ject ex­plores the fol­low­ing ques­tions: How do front­line work­ers pri­or­it­ize dif­fer­ent pur­poses of re­cord­keep­ing in every­day prac­tice? How is this re­flec­ted in ac­tu­al case re­cords, and what are the im­plic­a­tions for cit­izens and stake­hold­ers?

Valu­ing In­vis­ible Work: ef­fi­ciency am­bi­tions and di­git­al­iz­a­tion pro­jects in prac­tice

The pro­ject was fun­ded by the In­de­pend­ent Re­search Fund Den­mark and ran from 2020 to 2025. It fol­lowed di­git­al­iz­a­tion pro­jects in a range of pub­lic or­gan­iz­a­tions, fo­cus­ing on the craft­ing and cir­cu­la­tion of promis­sory doc­u­ments such as di­git­al­iz­a­tion strategies and busi­ness plans, as well as the new tasks that arise with di­git­al­iz­a­tion. The aim was to in­vest­ig­ate and the­or­ize the ‘in­vis­ible work’ in­volved in di­git­al­iz­a­tion pro­jects, in­clud­ing how this work is ascribed mean­ing and val­ued.
VIEW LinkedIn profile

Outside activities

2025 , -

No out­side activ­it­ies to re­port