The Soft Power of American Missionary Universities in China and of their Legacies

Volume 34 in ARC's working paper series Copenhagen Discussion Papers has been published.

Authors: Rasmus Gjedssø Bertelsen Postdoctoral Fellow at United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies and Visiting Researcher at Tokyo Institute of Technology. Steffen Thybo Møller Master student, Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen.

Title: The Soft Power of American Missionary Universities in China and of their Legacies: Yenching University, St. John’s University and Yale in China

Abstract:

This paper analyses the historical ‘direct’ soft power of American missionary universities in China and their ‘reverse’ soft power towards American society until their nationalization in the early 1950s. The paper also addresses the soft power of the legacies of these historical universities. This analysis is based on the cases of St. John’s University, Yale-in-China and Yenching University. American missionary universities were founded with the clear ‘direct’ soft power purpose of attracting the Chinese ‘other’ to Christianity. However, soft power resources often have unintended behavioral consequences and a particularly interesting one is ‘reverse’ soft power: Where the intended object society of soft power influences the originator society of soft power, for example, through education and advocacy. American missionary universities exercised substantial soft power both toward the Chinese host society and toward the American society. The institutions in China also left institutional legacies at American—and Canadian—universities which continue to hold soft power in the relationship between American and Chinese society.

The extent and limitation of this bidirectional soft power can be discerned from what attracted different actors to these universities and what those and other actors rejected about these universities; this is based on a detailed analysis of the relations between the universities and different public and private actors in the host society and the society of origin. These relations were characterized by the role of the universities as bridges between host society and society of origin carrying much information between societies, raising awareness and interest about the other society, moving elite-level human resources back and forth and raising large financial resources in the USA for education and research in China.

Download complete paper