Politics of Collective Memory: Insight from the Nordic Historiography on the Ukrainian famine in 1932-33

In spite of more than 20,000 publications on the Ukrainian famine of 1932-33 worldwide, the Nordic historiography of Holodomor has remained on the sideways of international research. In addition to filling this empirical gap, L. Dubinka-Hushcha has elabourated the concept of genocidation - a new approach to the study of memory politics in the post-Soviet nations.

Politics of Collective Memory: Insight from the Nordic Historiography on the Ukrainian famine in 1932-33

Lizaveta Dubinka-Hushcha
01/03/2020

The article analyses the intellectual origins of integrating the study of memory within the humanities. The author highlights the intertextuality  (de Saussure, J. Kristeva) and socially embedded character (J. Olick, R. Joyce, D. Levy) of memory studies. Inspired by a theory of securitization (B. Buzan, O. Wæver, J. de Wilde and other scholars from Copenhagen school), a somewhat new term of “genocidation” is introduced by the author in order to describe a re-invention of the Ukrainian post-Soviet identity narrative. Apart from theoretical approaches to interdisciplinary studies of memory politics in the post-globalized world, the article presents an attempt to investigate the status of the Ukrainian famine in Nordic historiography, pointing at the existing gap in academic research on this topic in the Nordic countries. A suggestion for further research is being made, conditioned upon the access to Danish, Swedish, Norwegian and Finnish archives. The article is a part of the joint project on the Soviet famine, carried out with the support from the ReNEW Excellency Hub of research at Copenhagen Business School and Bańska Bystrica University, Slovakia.

Link to article

The page was last edited by: Department of International Economics, Government and Business // 11/15/2021