New article by Maja Horst in Acta Sociologica
27.09.2010
Collective Closure? Public Debate as the Solution to Controversies about Science and Technology
by Maja Horst
Abstract
Developments in biotechnology have sparked off a number of social controversies during the past decades and it has been common to understand public debate as a necessary prerequisite for the ability to deal with these controversies. This is particularly true in the case of Denmark, where public debate has been taking place for more than 25 years; the article uses the Danish example to argue that controversies about biotechnology intersect with fundamental political discussions about order and control in today’s knowledge society. Inspired by cultural theory and the work of Mary Douglas, it is proposed that arguments about biotechnology are justified by reference to particular articulations of social order. Her four notions of social order are identified in the analysis of a sample of arguments from four major Danish newspapers. On the basis of this typology, the article examines the broad discursive consensus in favour of public debate and participatory exercises regarding the social responses to biotechnology. Simultaneously, however, it points to inherent tensions in expectations towards public debate and its role in the creation of solutions to controversies over science and technology.
|
Acta Sociologica, September 2010, Vol. 53(3): 195-211, doi:10.1177/0001699310374904
|
Kontaktperson:
Maja Horst,
mho.ioa@cbs.dk, tlf: 3815 2826
Sidst opdateret af Dorrit Majlund 27.09.2010