Faculty
Torben J. Andersen, Professor (Center for Strategic Management and Globalization, CBS), Richard A. Bettis, Professor (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA), Nicolai J. Foss, Professor (Center for Strategic Management and Globalization, CBS) and Richard M. Langlois, Professor (University of Connecticut, USA)
Course Coordinator
Torben J. Andersen
Prerequisite
PhD enrolment – open for all PhD students with research interests in strategic management.
Course content, structure and teaching
The course is organised around nine half-day sessions (two x three hours per day) over the week followed by a final reflective session on the last afternoon, where participants can relate the course topics to their own individual research agendas (see below for a tentative schedule).
|
|
18.08.08
|
19.08.08
|
20.08.08
|
21.08.08
|
22.08.08
|
|
09:00 - 12:00
|
Introdution: Content vs. Process (TA)
|
The Corporate Strategy Process
(RB)
|
Transaction Cost Perspectives
(NF)
|
Modularity, Organisation, and Innovation
(RL)
|
Trends in Strategy Research
(TA/NF)
|
|
12:00 - 13:30
|
LUNCH
|
LUNCH
|
LUNCH
|
LUNCH
|
LUNCH
|
|
13:30 - 16:30
|
Adaptation and Strategic Renewal (TA)
|
Strategy in Transition (RB)
|
The Modularity Theory of the Firm (RL)
|
Knowledge and Resources (NF)
|
Status and Reflection (TA/NF)
|
Monday 18.08.2008
Introduction: Content versus process – Torben J. Andersen (09:00-12:00)
Synopsis:
What do we mean by the term ‘strategy’ and how does the strategic management field relate to management research in general? A conventional strategy perspective is structured according to level of analysis and analytical content versus execution and control ordered as sequential process elements. We cover different aspects of strategy-making and discuss, whether these can be reconciled.
References:
- Porter, M. 1979. From competitive advantage to corporate strategy, Harvard Business Review, 65(3): 43-59
- Wernerfelt, B. 1985. A resource-based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5: 171-181
- Mintzberg, H. & Waters, J. 1985. Of strategies, deliberate and emergent, Strategic Management Journal, 6: 257-272
- Hart, S. 1992. An integrative framework for strategy-making processes, Academy of Management Review, 17: 327-351
- Andersen, T. J. 2004. Integrating decentralized strategy making and strategic planning processes in dynamic environments, Journal of Management Studies, 41: 1271-1299.
Adaptation and strategic renewal – Torben J. Andersen (13:30-16:30)
Synopsis:
Strategic management is in search of effective responses to the challenges posed by increasingly dynamic and complex environmental conditions in the contemporary global economies. What are the appropriate answers to this challenge and what outcomes are associated with this? We will introduce various perspectives to these issues and discuss possible solutions.
References:
- Illinitch, A. Y., D’Aveni, R. A. & Lewin, A. Y. 1996. New organizational forms and strategies for managing in hypercompetitive environments. Organization Science, 7: 211-220
- Burgelman, R. A. 1996. A process model of strategic business exit: Implications for an evolutionary perspective on strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 193-214
- Noda, T. & Bower, J. L. 1996. Strategy making as iterated processes of resource allocation. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 159-192
- Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 509-533
- Andersen, T. J., Denrell, J. & Bettis, R. A. 2007. Strategic responsiveness and Bowman’s Risk-Return Paradox. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 407-429.
Tuesday 19.08.2008
The corporate strategy process – Richard A. Bettis (09:00-12:00)
Synopsis:
Corporate strategy is an area where strategic management has developed many valuable insights, but where it also remains somewhat controversial in its normative contribution. What is the appropriate balance between business relatedness that may gain economic efficiencies and resource diversity that may drive new business development? We will take a closer look at some of these challenges.
References:
- Bettis, R. A. 1981. Performance differences in related and unrelated diversified firms, Strategic Management Journal, 2: 327-343
- Bettis, R. A. & Prahalad, C. K. 1995. The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension, Strategic Management Journal, 16: 5-14.
Strategy in transition – Richard A. Bettis (13:30-16:00)
Synopsis:
The competitive landscape is changing and imposes new demands of effective strategy-making processes dealing with new technologies, ongoing innovation, research and development etc. In this session, we will discuss these challenges and uncover alternative responsive approaches.
References:
- Bettis, R. A. 1991. Strategic management and the straightjacket: An editorial essay. Organization Science, 2: 315-319
- Bettis, R. A. & Hitt, M. A. 1995. The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 7-19.
Wednesday 20.08.2008
Transaction Cost Perspectives – Nicolai J. Foss (09:00-12:00)
Synopsis:
Transaction cost economics has been a controversial theory in strategy research. Thus, it has been argued that it builds on an overly cynical assumption about human nature, and focus on cost minimisation at the expense of value creation. Here we develop the arguments that transaction costs are crucial for the understanding of value creation, and in particular, the impediments to value creation.
References:
- Williamson, O. E. 1979. Transaction cost economics: The governance of transaction relations, Journal of Law and Economics, 22: 233-261
- Williamson, O. E. 1991. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 269-296
- Foss, N. J. 2003. The strategic management and transaction cost nexus, central questions, and future research possibilities, Strategic Organization, 1, 139-169.
The modularity theory of the company – Richard N. Langlois (13:30-16:30)
Synopsis:
The modularity theory of the company is a perspective on organisation that is complementary to both the transaction-cost approach and the capabilities or resource-based view of the company. It provides insights into the ways, in which organisational design can be a tool of strategy.
References:
- Langlois, R. N. 2002. Modularity in technology and organization, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 49(1), 19-37
- Baldwin, C. Y. 2008. Where do transactions come from? Industrial and Corporate Change, 17, 155-195
- Langlois, R. N. 2006. The secret life of mundane transaction costs, Organization Studies, 27, 1389-1410.
Thursday 21.08.2008
Modularity, organisation, and innovation – Richard N. Langlois (09:00-12:00)
Synopsis:
Which kinds of organisations are best at generating and using innovations? Under what circumstances can a compnay profit from “open innovation” and when is a proprietary strategy more desirable? What are the effects on innovation of outsourcing – and what are the organisational alternatives?
References:
- Langlois, R. N. & Robertson, P. L. 1992. Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries, Research Policy,21, 297-313
- Chesbrough, H. W. 2003. The era of open innovation, Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35-41
- Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A. & Pavitt, K. 2001. Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 597-621.
Knowledge and resources – Nicolai J. Foss (13:30-16:30)
Synopsis:
Over the past decade or so, the resource-based view (RBV) has become a prominent approach to strategy content research. In particular, it has become important in the analysis of sustained competitive advantage. Here we provide an overview of the main contributions of this stream of resource-based research and discuss some of the criticisms of it.
References:
- Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17: 99-120
- Peteraf, M. A. 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage, Strategic Management Journal, 14, 179-191
- Foss, N. J. 2003. Bounded rationality and tacit knowledge in the organizational capabilities approach: An evaluation and a stocktaking, Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 185-201.
Friday 22.08.2008 – Torben J. Andersen & Nicolai J. Foss (09:00-12:00)
Issues in strategy research
Synopsis:
To some, strategy research may appear to move in circles, i.e., first one perspective predominates as it emerges from the critique of a former perspective, but once this perspective has dominated the field for some time, the pendulum moves back and the prior perspective comes back into the fore. Is this a sensible and productive research mode?
References:
- Priem, R. L. & Butler, J. E. 2001. Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26: 22-40
- Powell, T. C. 2001. Competitive advantage: Logical and philosophical considerations, Strategic Management Journal, 22: 875-888
- Volberda, H. W. 2004. Crisis in strategy: Fragmentation, integration or synthesis, European Management Review, 1: 35-42.
Status and reflection – Torben J. Andersen & Nicolai J. Foss (13:00-15:00)
Synopsis:
The strategy field is confronted with the challenges of a changing managerial reality. What are the greatest challenges to corporate executives? How should we respond to these challenges? Where do you want to drive your future research efforts?
Teaching methods
While the course is organised around a series of formal presentations with assigned readings, class sessions encourage discussion, where participants are expected to comment on and critique the topics assigned for each session. The course will furnish discussions about recent developments and trends in the strategy field and provide an opportunity to outline important research agendas for the future.
Course literature
- Porter, M. 1979. From competitive advantage to corporate strategy, Harvard Business Review, 65(3): 43-59
- Wernerfelt, B. 1985. A resource-based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5: 171-181
- Mintzberg, H. & Waters, J. 1985. Of strategies, deliberate and emergent, Strategic Management Journal, 6: 257-272
- Hart, S. 1992. An integrative framework for strategy-making processes, Academy of Management Review, 17: 327-351
- Andersen, T. J. 2004. Integrating decentralized strategy making and strategic planning processes in dynamic environments, Journal of Management Studies, 41: 1271-1299
- Illinitch, A. Y., D’Aveni, R. A. & Lewin, A. Y. 1996. New organizational forms and strategies for managing in hypercompetitive environments. Organization Science, 7: 211-220
- Burgelman, R. A. 1996. A process model of strategic business exit: Implications for an evolutionary perspective on strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 193-214
- Noda, T. & Bower, J. L. 1996. Strategy making as iterated processes of resource allocation. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 159-192
- Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 509-533
- Andersen, T. J., Denrell, J. & Bettis, R. A. 2007. Strategic responsiveness and Bowman’s Risk-Return Paradox. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 407-429
- Bettis, R. A. 1991. Strategic management and the straightjacket: An editorial essay. Organization Science, 2: 315-319
- Bettis, R. A. & Hitt, M. A. 1995. The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 7-19
- Bettis, R. A. 1981. Performance differences in related and unrelated diversified firms, Strategic Management Journal, 2: 327-343
- Bettis, R. A. & Prahalad, C. K. 1995. The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension, Strategic Management Journal, 16: 5-14
- Williamson, O. E. 1979. Transaction cost economics: The governance of transaction relations, Journal of Law and Economics, 22: 233-261
- Williamson, O. E. 1991. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 269-296
- Foss, N. J. 2003. The strategic management and transaction cost nexus, central questions, and future research possibilities, Strategic Organization, 1, 139-169
- Langlois, R. N. 2002. Modularity in technology and organization, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 49(1), 19-37
- Baldwin, C. Y. 2008. Where do transactions come from? Industrial and Corporate Change, 17, 155-195
- Langlois, R. N. 2006. The secret life of mundane transaction costs, Organization Studies, 27, 1389-1410
- Langlois, R. N. & Robertson, P. L. 1992. Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries, Research Policy,21, 297-313
- Chesbrough, H. W. 2003. The era of open innovation, Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35-41
- Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A. & Pavitt, K. 2001. Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 597-621
- Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17: 99-120
- Peteraf, M. A. 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage, Strategic Management Journal, 14, 179-191
- Foss, N. J. 2003. Bounded rationality and tacit knowledge in the organizational capabilities approach: An evaluation and a stocktaking, Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 185-201
- Priem, R. L. & Butler, J. E. 2001. Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26: 22-40
- Powell, T. C. 2001. Competitive advantage: Logical and philosophical considerations, Strategic Management Journal, 22: 875-888
- Volberda, H. W. 2004. Crisis in strategy: Fragmentation, integration or synthesis, European Management Review, 1: 35-42.
Enrolment
No later than 01.05.2008
Sidst opdateret af Frederik Hoff 04.03.2009